EVALUASI PROGRAM BROADBAND LEARNING CENTER DINAS PERPUSTAKAAN DAN KEARSIPAN KOTA LUBUKLINGGAU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37108/shaut.v14i1.660Keywords:
Evaluation, BLC Program, Public LibraryAbstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the implementation of programs related to the evaluation of the Program Broadband Learning Center at the Lubuklinggau City Library and Archives Service. The research method is descriptive quantitative. The research sample totaled 93 (ninety three) respondents from participants who attended training in 2017, 2018, 2019, and the samples were taken randomly. The results of the component research input obtained a result of 4.09 (four point nine blanks) included in the Good criteria. The component Activities and Processes obtained a result of 3.84 (three point eighty four) included in the Good criteria, but there were 2 (two) statements in this component that obtained an average score with poor criteria.The component Output obtained a result of 4.10 (four point ten) which is included in the Good criteria. The results of the recapitulation of the components Input, Activities and processes, as well as the Output of 4.01 (four point blank one) are included in the Good criteria with the predicate successful.
References
Arifin, Z. (2019). Evaluasi Program. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Azis, A. (2016). Penerapan Logic Model pada Evaluasi Inovasi Pembelajaran. ARICIS I Ar-Raniry International Conference on Islamic Studies, 57–71.
Chen, H. T., Pan, H. L. W., Morosanu, L., & Turner, N. (2018). Using logic models and the action model/change model schema in planning the learning community program: A comparative case study. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 33(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.42116 https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/aricis/article/view 936.
Dewi, L. K. C., Wardana, I. M., Yasa, N. N. K., & Sukaatmadja, I. P. G. (2021). Entrepreneurial Marketing, Customer Relationship Marketing, Inovasi Produk, dan Daya Saing UKM: Konsep dan Aplikasi dalam Penelitian (R. R. Rerung (ed.)). Bandung : CV. Media Sanis Indonesia. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Entrepreneurial_Marketing_Customer_Relat/m-sxEAAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1
Jipp.sumselprov.go.id. (2018). Melek Internet Berkat Perpustakaan. Http://Jipp.Sumselprov.Go.Id/Direktori/Read/76.
Mufliha. (2018). Evaluasi Program Broadband Learning Center (Studi Tentang Efektivitas Dan Efisiensi Pada Program Broadband Learning Center Di Kota Surabaya). Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 6(2), 1–11. http://journal.unair.ac.id/.
Purwanto, Rahadi, A., & Lasmono, S. (2007). Pengembangan Modul. Jakarta : Pusat Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Pendidikan. https://fdokumen.com/document/4c-buku-pengembangan-modul-full.html.
Sardjo, S., Darmajanti, L., & Boedjono, K. C. (2016). Implementasi Model Evaluasi Formatif Program Pembangunan Sosial (EEPPS)?: partisipasi multipihak dan evaluasi program. Jakarta : Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Siregar, A. R. (2011). Perencanaan Lokasi Perpustakaan Umum Spasial di Wilayah Perkotaan. Medan : USU Press.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan?: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Vionita, N. A. dan T. R. (2019). Efektivitas Program Broadband Learning Center (Blc) Di Eks. Wisma Barbara, Kupang Gunung, Kota Surabaya. Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(1), 1–7.https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/publika/article/view/26950
Yusuf, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian?: Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan (1st ed.). Jakarta : Kencana.?
