ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIC DARI PROGRAM HIBAH (BIBLIOMETRIC OF GRANTS PROGRAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37108/shaut.v13i2.565Keywords:
Bibliometric; Grants program; Scopus; VosviewerAbstract
This article is a bibliometric analysis of articles published in Scopus indexed journals that discuss grant programs using Vosviewer. The purpose of bibliometric analysis is aimed at knowing the development of studies related to the grant program. Specifically, this study looks at the development of citations, publication trends, author collaboration, trend terms titles, trend terms author keywords, trend terms abstracts, and state statistics on grant program articles in 2015-2020. Data were collected from the Scopus database using the keyword "grants program". Furthermore, the author uses vosviewer software to analyze and visualize the database obtained. The results showed that the highest number of citations (citations) occurred in 2019 as many as 203 citations. In the publication trend, the most publications occurred in 2019 with 72 articles. Only one author collaborated with three other co-authors namely Kegler M.C. The most used term in the title is 'human' with 143 occurrences. The most used keyword term is 'cash transfer' with 11 passes. The most widely used term in the abstract is 'human' with 143 occurrences. Furthermore, the countries that published the most grant program articles were the United States with 246 articles, Canada with twenty-four articles, and Australia with eighteen articles.
References
Ajeng Tita et al. (2020). Sustainability Reporting?: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik Pada Database Scopus. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 5, 137–157.
Amerika James, Mckeen Cattell, and S. A. (2006). The Origin of Bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–33.
Benjamin, M. (2012). Citation Analysis.
Chen, C. (2003). Mapping Scientific: The Quest For Knowledge Visulization. SpringerVerlag.
De-Moya-Anegon, F., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E., Munoz- Fernandez, F. J., & Navarrete-Cortes, J. (2004). Indicadores bibliometricos de la actividad cientifica espanola: (ISI, Web of science, 1998-2002) [Bibliometric indicators of Spanish scientific activity: (ISI, Web of science, 1998-2002)]. FECYT-Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia.
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics And Citation Analysis. Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Devos, P. (2011). Research and Bibliometrics: A Long History. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, 35(5), 336–337.
Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York: The Haworth Press.
Dukarina Idhani yupi Royan. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Jurnal Marine Research in Indonesia 1. Marine Research, 25(4), 63–68.
Ellegaard, O., Wallin, J. . (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809–1831.
Erwina, Wina, Kurniasih, N., Y. (2010). Analisis Sitasi Karya Dosen Fikom pada Database GDL. Universitas Padjadjaran.
Glanzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a Research Field: A Course on Theory and Application of Bibliometric Indicators.
I Diane Cooper. (2018). Bibliometrics Basics. Medical Librar Association 4, August, 217–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3163/1536- 5050.103.4.013
Jacobs, D. (2001). A Bibliometric Study of the Publication Patterns of Scientists in South Africa 1992-1996, with Particular Reference to Status and Funding. Information Research, 6 (3): 104.
Julia, J., Supriatna, E., Isrokatun, I., Aisyah, I., Aminat O., A., Hakim, A. (2020). Moral Education (2010-2019): A Bibliometric Study (Part 2). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 2954–2968.
López-Robles, J.-R., Guallar, J. (2019). El profesional de la información (EPI): Bibliometric and thematic analysis (2006-2017). El Profesional de La Información, 28, 1– 23.
Oregon State University. (2011). What is a Citation?
Pandu, M. . (2012). Kajian Bibliometrik Bahan Ajar Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Terbuka?: Studi Analisis Layanan Pustaka Universitas Terbuka Menggunakan Analisis sitiran dan COWords. Universitas Terbuka Press.
Rahayu, S., Saleh, A. R. (2017). Studi Bibliometrik dan Sebaran Topik Penelitian pada Jurnal Hayati Terbitan 2012-2016. Pustakaloka, 201–218.
Ramos, J., Gutierrez, F., Masia, M., Martin-Hidalgo, A. (2004). Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991–2001): a bibliometric evaluation. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 23, 180–184.
Reuters, T. (2008). Using Bibliometrics: A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data.
Rohanda, Winoto, Y. (2019). Analisis Bibliometrika Tingkat Kolaborasi, Produktivitas Penulis, Serta Profil Artikel Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Tahun 2014- 2018. PUSTABIBLIA: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/pustabiblia.v3i1
Russell, J.M., Rousseau, R. (2015). Bibliometrics and Institutional Evaluation.
Velasco, B., Bouza, J.M.E., Pinilla, J.M., Roman, J. A. S. (2012). La utilizacion de los indicadores bibliometricos para evaluar la actividad investigadora. Aula Abierta, 40, 75–84.
Widuri, N. . (2018). Tingkat Kolaborasi, Produktivitas penulis dan artikel metrik pada jurnal. Jurnal Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi.
Zupic, I., & C ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18( 3), 429 – 472.
