Scholarly communication dan peran perpustakaan perguruan tinggi
Keywords:
scholarly communication, publishing, open accsess, information literacy, academic libraryAbstract
This paper presents an explanation of the understanding, the scope of scholarly communication and its relationship with the publishing business related to serial crises, open access, and the potential extension of the role (extended role) of academic libraries. Currently the role of the library only focuses on user education programs (library instruction) which aims to disseminate the collection/resources library and its search strategy, especially those that are online or electronic. This role is only alluding with a small area of scholarly communication, namely discovery and dissemination. A wider role is information literacy programs, whose materials are packaged, expanded and aligned with the dynamics and scores of scholarly communication. This role is expected to spur engagement and contribution in developing a scholarly communication environment that is conducive to the development of science.
References
Alexander, A., & Goodyear, M. (2000). Changing the role of research libraries in scholarly
communication. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 5(3).
https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0005.302
Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Comparing repository types: challenges and barriers
for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and
institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. ArXiv:1005.0839 [Cs].
Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0839
Association of College & Research Libraries. (2003, June 24). Principles and strategies for
the reform of scholarly communication 1. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies
Association of College & Research Libraries. (2013). Intersections of scholarly
communication and information literacy: creating strategic collaborations for a
changing academic environment. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research
Libraries. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Inters
ections.pdf
Atkinson, R. (1996). Library functions, scholarly communication, and the foundation of the
digital library: laying claim to the control zone. Library Quarterly, 66(3), 239–266.
Australasian Open Access Strategy Group. (2013, December 5). What is Open Access?
Retrieved from https://aoasg.org.au/what-is-open-access/
Berlin Declaration on Open Access. (2003, October 22). Berlin declaration on open access to
knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. (2003, June 20). Bethesda statement on
open access publishing. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Borgman, C. L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication
Research, 16(5), 583–600.
Borgman, C. L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication.
Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 412–430.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007121
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2017, February 14). Budapest Open Access Initiative.
Retrieved May 14, 2017, from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/
Davis, S. (1995). Surviving the serials crisis: are e-journals an answer? Serials Review, 21(4),
95.
Davis-Kahl, S., & Hensley, M. K. (Eds.). (2013). Common ground at the nexus of
information literacy and scholarly communication. Chicago: Association of College
and Research Libraries.
Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299–306.
Elsevier. (2017). What is peer review? Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/what-is-peer-review
Graham, T. W. (2000). Scholarly communication. Serials, 13(1), 3–11.
Harloe, B., & Budd, J. M. (1994). Collection development and scholarly communication in
the era of electronic access. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 83–88.
Joint Information Systems Committee. (2013, April 2). Implementing a virtual research
environment (VRE). Retrieved May 2, 2017, from
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/implementing-a-virtual-research-environment-vre
Klain-Gabbay, L., & Shoham, S. (2016). Scholarly communication and academic librarians.
Library & Information Science Research, 38(2), 170–179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.004
Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic
publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890–
906. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AIDASI6>3.0.CO;2-8
Lynch, C. A. (1992). Reaction, response, and realization: from the crisis in scholarly
communication to the age of networked information. Serials Review, 18(1/2), 107–
114.
Lynch, C. A. (1994). Scholarly communication in the networked environment: Reconsidering
economics and organizational missions. Serials Review, 20(3), 23–46.
Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the
digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336.
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039
Malenfant, K. J. (2015). Leading Change in the System of Scholarly Communication: A Case
Study of Engaging Liaison Librarians for Outreach to Faculty. College & Research
Libraries, 76(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.3.392
McGuigan, G. S. (2004). Publishing perils in academe: the serials crisis and the economics of
the academic journal publishing industry. Journal of Business & Finance
Librarianship, 10(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J109v10n01_03
Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
OECD. (2004, January 30). Declaration on access to research data from public funding.
Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=157
Paisley, W. (1989). Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research.
Communication Research, 16(5), 701–718.
Pascarelli, A. M. (1990). Coping strategies for libraries facing the serials crisis. Serials
Review, 16(1), 75.
Profera, E., Jefferson, R., & Hosburgh, N. (2015). Personalizing library service to improve
scholarly communication. Serials Librarian, 68(1–4), 274–281.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1017710
Rodriguez, J. E. (2015). Scholarly communications competencies: open access training for
librarians. New Library World, 116(7/8), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-12-
2014-0140
Roosendaal, H. E., & Geurts, P. A. T. M. (1997). Forces and functions in scientific
communication: an analysis of their interplay (pp. 1–32). Presented at the Conference
on “Co-operative Research in Information Systems in Physics,” University of
Oldenburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://doc.utwente.nl/60395/
Schatzle, C. (2006). A proposed solution to the scholarly communications crisis. Journal of
Access Services, 3(3), 37–47.
Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics
and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73–100.
Schwartz, C. A. (1994). The strength of weak ties in electronic development of the scholarly
communication system. College & Research Libraries, 55(6), 529–541.
Shaughnessy, T. W. (1989). Scholarly communication: the need for an agenda for action--a
symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 68–72.
Shearer, K., & Birdsall, W. F. (2005). A researcher’s research agenda for scholarly
communication in Canada. New Review of Information Networking, 11(1), 99–108.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13614570500269520
Ward, R., Michaelis, D., Murdoch, R., Roberts, B., & Blixrud, J. (2003). Widespread
academic efforts address the scholarly communication crisis. College & Research
Libraries News, 64(6), 382.
Ware, M. (2004). Pathfinder research on web-based repositories. London: Publisher and
Library/Learning Solutions.
Wenzler, J. (2017). Scholarly communication and the dilemma of collective action: why
academic journals cost too much. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 183–200.
https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.183
Yiotis, K. (2005). The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications.
Information Technology & Libraries, 24(4), 157–162.
communication. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 5(3).
https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0005.302
Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Comparing repository types: challenges and barriers
for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and
institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. ArXiv:1005.0839 [Cs].
Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0839
Association of College & Research Libraries. (2003, June 24). Principles and strategies for
the reform of scholarly communication 1. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies
Association of College & Research Libraries. (2013). Intersections of scholarly
communication and information literacy: creating strategic collaborations for a
changing academic environment. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research
Libraries. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Inters
ections.pdf
Atkinson, R. (1996). Library functions, scholarly communication, and the foundation of the
digital library: laying claim to the control zone. Library Quarterly, 66(3), 239–266.
Australasian Open Access Strategy Group. (2013, December 5). What is Open Access?
Retrieved from https://aoasg.org.au/what-is-open-access/
Berlin Declaration on Open Access. (2003, October 22). Berlin declaration on open access to
knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. (2003, June 20). Bethesda statement on
open access publishing. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Borgman, C. L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication
Research, 16(5), 583–600.
Borgman, C. L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication.
Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 412–430.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007121
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2017, February 14). Budapest Open Access Initiative.
Retrieved May 14, 2017, from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/
Davis, S. (1995). Surviving the serials crisis: are e-journals an answer? Serials Review, 21(4),
95.
Davis-Kahl, S., & Hensley, M. K. (Eds.). (2013). Common ground at the nexus of
information literacy and scholarly communication. Chicago: Association of College
and Research Libraries.
Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299–306.
Elsevier. (2017). What is peer review? Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/what-is-peer-review
Graham, T. W. (2000). Scholarly communication. Serials, 13(1), 3–11.
Harloe, B., & Budd, J. M. (1994). Collection development and scholarly communication in
the era of electronic access. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 83–88.
Joint Information Systems Committee. (2013, April 2). Implementing a virtual research
environment (VRE). Retrieved May 2, 2017, from
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/implementing-a-virtual-research-environment-vre
Klain-Gabbay, L., & Shoham, S. (2016). Scholarly communication and academic librarians.
Library & Information Science Research, 38(2), 170–179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.004
Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic
publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890–
906. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AIDASI6>3.0.CO;2-8
Lynch, C. A. (1992). Reaction, response, and realization: from the crisis in scholarly
communication to the age of networked information. Serials Review, 18(1/2), 107–
114.
Lynch, C. A. (1994). Scholarly communication in the networked environment: Reconsidering
economics and organizational missions. Serials Review, 20(3), 23–46.
Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the
digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336.
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039
Malenfant, K. J. (2015). Leading Change in the System of Scholarly Communication: A Case
Study of Engaging Liaison Librarians for Outreach to Faculty. College & Research
Libraries, 76(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.3.392
McGuigan, G. S. (2004). Publishing perils in academe: the serials crisis and the economics of
the academic journal publishing industry. Journal of Business & Finance
Librarianship, 10(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J109v10n01_03
Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
OECD. (2004, January 30). Declaration on access to research data from public funding.
Retrieved May 14, 2017, from
http://acts.oecd.org/Instruments/ShowInstrumentView.aspx?InstrumentID=157
Paisley, W. (1989). Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research.
Communication Research, 16(5), 701–718.
Pascarelli, A. M. (1990). Coping strategies for libraries facing the serials crisis. Serials
Review, 16(1), 75.
Profera, E., Jefferson, R., & Hosburgh, N. (2015). Personalizing library service to improve
scholarly communication. Serials Librarian, 68(1–4), 274–281.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1017710
Rodriguez, J. E. (2015). Scholarly communications competencies: open access training for
librarians. New Library World, 116(7/8), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-12-
2014-0140
Roosendaal, H. E., & Geurts, P. A. T. M. (1997). Forces and functions in scientific
communication: an analysis of their interplay (pp. 1–32). Presented at the Conference
on “Co-operative Research in Information Systems in Physics,” University of
Oldenburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://doc.utwente.nl/60395/
Schatzle, C. (2006). A proposed solution to the scholarly communications crisis. Journal of
Access Services, 3(3), 37–47.
Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics
and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73–100.
Schwartz, C. A. (1994). The strength of weak ties in electronic development of the scholarly
communication system. College & Research Libraries, 55(6), 529–541.
Shaughnessy, T. W. (1989). Scholarly communication: the need for an agenda for action--a
symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 68–72.
Shearer, K., & Birdsall, W. F. (2005). A researcher’s research agenda for scholarly
communication in Canada. New Review of Information Networking, 11(1), 99–108.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13614570500269520
Ward, R., Michaelis, D., Murdoch, R., Roberts, B., & Blixrud, J. (2003). Widespread
academic efforts address the scholarly communication crisis. College & Research
Libraries News, 64(6), 382.
Ware, M. (2004). Pathfinder research on web-based repositories. London: Publisher and
Library/Learning Solutions.
Wenzler, J. (2017). Scholarly communication and the dilemma of collective action: why
academic journals cost too much. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 183–200.
https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.183
Yiotis, K. (2005). The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications.
Information Technology & Libraries, 24(4), 157–162.
