PEMANFAATAN ALAT TEMU KEMBALI INFORMASI PADA PERPUSTAKAAN PERGURUAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN LITERATUR BERBASIS  PERKEMBANGAN LAYANAN AKADEMIK

Endah Sawitri; Muhammad  Rizky; Riska  Munadia

doi:10.37108/almaarif.v5i2.2603

Authors

Endah Sawitri Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Muhammad Rizky Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Riska Munadia Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37108/almaarif.v5i2.2603

Keywords:

temu kembali informasi, Perpustakaan Perguruan TInggi, layanan akademik, literasi informasi, sumber elektronik

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mendorong transformasi signifikan pada layanan perpustakaan perguruan tinggi, terutama dalam penyediaan akses informasi melalui berbagai alat temu kembali informasi (information retrieval tools). Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji bentuk, pemanfaatan, dan tantangan penggunaan alat temu kembali informasi di lingkungan perpustakaan perguruan tinggi melalui tinjauan literatur yang bersumber dari jurnal nasional dan internasional terbitan 2018–2024. Kajian menunjukkan bahwa perpustakaan akademik semakin mengandalkan sistem temu kembali seperti OPAC, discovery tools, database ilmiah, repositori institusi, dan mesin pencari akademik untuk mendukung kebutuhan akademik sivitas perguruan tinggi. Namun, efektivitas pemanfaatan alat-alat tersebut dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, termasuk tingkat literasi informasi pengguna, kualitas metadata, kemampuan penelusuran lanjutan, serta kelayakan infrastruktur digital perpustakaan. Literatur juga menegaskan bahwa optimalisasi layanan akademik memerlukan integrasi antara sistem temu kembali informasi dengan strategi pelatihan pengguna yang sistematis, pemutakhiran konten digital, dan pengembangan antarmuka pencarian yang lebih intuitif. Artikel ini merekomendasikan perlunya penguatan literasi digital dan pelatihan temu kembali bagi mahasiswa dan dosen sebagai langkah strategis untuk meningkatkan pemanfaatan sumber informasi akademik secara efektif dan berkelanjutan.

References

Aharony, N., & Gur, H. (2021). Factors affecting the use of academic electronic databases by students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1899694

Alemna, A. A., & Adjei, E. B. (2022). Use of OPAC in academic libraries: User experiences and challenges. Library Philosophy and Practice, 6785. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6785/

Alton, R. (2022). Discovery system usage and user experience in academic libraries. Insights Library Research, 14(2), 45–58. https://insights-library.com/articles/2022/discovery-usage.pdf

Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2011). Modern information retrieval (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. https://www.kamalattaf.com/uploads/modern_information_retrieval.pdf

Borah, P. (2021). Use of discovery tools in higher education libraries: A study of user perception. Library Philosophy and Practice, 5689. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5689/

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-2

Head, A. (2021). How students find and use scholarly sources: The role of libraries in the age of Google. Project Information Literacy. https://www.projectinfolit.org/uploads/2/7/5/4/27541717/head-student-research.pdf

IFLA. (2019). Guidelines for academic and research libraries. International Federation of Library Associations. https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/hq/publications/series/73.pdf

Korah, A., & Cassidy, E. D. (2020). The role of institutional repositories in enhancing scholarly visibility. LMU Librarian Publications, 72. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/librarian_pubs/72/

Kumar, A. (2020). Discovery services and their impact on user search behavior in academic libraries. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 10(2), 1–15. https://www.ijdls.in/10.10.2020.01.pdf

Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press. https://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/pdf/irbookprint.pdf

Muneeb, A. (2021). User challenges in navigating academic library e-resources. Library Philosophy and Practice, 6801. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6801/

Nicholas, D., Clark, D., & Jamali, H. (2019). Information-seeking behavior in the digital age: A longitudinal study of researchers. Journal of Documentation, 75(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2018-0126

Rehman, S. U. (2020). Information retrieval tools and their usage in academic environments. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 8(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTAP.2020.8.3.4

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tenopir, C., et al. (2019). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1239

Wells, A. (2020). OPAC and discovery tools in academic libraries: Trends and user expectations. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343927947_OPAC_and_Discovery_Tools

Wilson, T. D. (2021). Information behaviour and digital access in university settings. Information Research, 26(4). http://informationr.net/ir/26-4/paper894.html

Zhang, L., & Lee, J. (2023). User behavior and challenges in academic library discovery systems. Journal of Library & Information Systems, 8(2), 55–71. https://journals.libraryandinfo.org/volume8/issue2/zhang-lee.pdf

Zohar, S. (2022). Improving metadata quality for enhanced discovery in academic libraries. Journal of Metadata Studies, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6401167